Why the Higgs Boson Discovery Is Disappointing, According to the Smartest Man in the World


In confirming what we already thought, the Higgs Boson discovery portends a close to a glorious chapter of particle physics.


Experimental physicists around the world are celebrating the discovery of the Higgs boson, which was officially announced yesterday. While many of us are trying to figure out what the Higgs boson is, and whether calling it the God particle is stupid, one of the smartest guys in the world, Stephen Wolfram, is sad.

boy genius who got his CalTech PhD at 20, Wolfram dabbled in particle physics before creating theMathematica software package, and then WolframAlpha, a “computational engine” that debuted to considerable fanfare a few years ago.

In an elegiac blog post, Wolfram notes that the discovery of the Higgs brings a lifetime (his lifetime) of physics research to a close. It confirms the “Standard Model,” which is the putative organization of the subatomic universe that scientists have been working on for decades. That might sound like a good thing, but confirming what we already thought was the case actually is actually a lot less interesting than discovering something fundamentally new.

Here’s Wolfram (emphasis added):

It’s been 35 years, and when it comes to new particles and the like, there really hasn’t been a single surprise. (The discovery of neutrino masses is a partial counterexample, as are various discoveries in cosmology.) Experiments have certainly discovered things–the W and Z bosons, the validity of QCD, the top quark. But all of them were as expected from the Standard Model; there were no surprises.

At some level I’m actually a little disappointed. I’ve made no secret–even to Peter Higgs–that I’ve never especially liked the Higgs mechanism. It’s always seemed like a hack. And I’ve always hoped that in the end there’d be something more elegant and deep responsible for something as fundamental as the masses of particles. But it appears that nature is just picking what seems like a pedestrian solution to the problem: the Higgs mechanism in the Standard Model…

If the Standard Model is correct, yesterday’s announcement is likely to be the last major discovery that could be made in a particle accelerator in our generation. Now, of course, there could be surprises, but it’s not clear how much one should bet on them.

When I was reporting on the opening of the Large Hadron Collider a few years ago, I talked with a lot of scientists and came to the same conclusion that Wolfram did: Discovering the Higgs boson is a victory for physicists but a sad day for physics. In 2008, I (somewhat cheekily) called the discovery (or rather, confirmation) of the Higgs boson the “worst-case scenario” for the Standard Model.

Of course, we could find all sorts of other surprises lurking within the experiments at the LHC, and there is much that we do not know about physics generally. But this is a moment to recognize that the dominant field for the world’s biggest brains in the 20th century — particle physics — may not immediately unlock any more of the universe’s important secrets.
This article available online at:



3 thoughts on “Why the Higgs Boson Discovery Is Disappointing, According to the Smartest Man in the World

  1. This is nonsense. Lord Kelvin said at the end of the nineteenth century everything in physics has been discovered, only more experiments will more accurately determine the physical constants (like the speed of light, etc.). How utterly wrong he was. The twentieth century brought relativity and the quantum theory, two of the greatest discoveries in physics.

    There is still a great deal of work still necessary in quantum theory – it is not complete. And the standard model needs a great deal more work – it is far from complete.

    But Stephen Wolfram has always been controversial. Although a brilliant man, he went on his own mission of crack pottery and created some “physics’ that was shot down in flames.


      • Stephen Wolfram wrote a book called “A New Kind Of Science”. One reviewer had this to say about it.

        ” A Rare Blend of Monster Raving Egomania and Utter Batshit Insanity.

        “I suppose it’s customary in writing reviews of this sort to try to say what has driven Wolfram to write such a bad, self-destructive book. But the truth is I couldn’t care less. He has talent, and once had some promise; he has squandered them. I am going to keep my copy of A New Kind of Science, sitting on the same shelf as Atlantis in Wisconsin, The Cosmic Forces of Mu, Of Grammatology, and the people who think the golden ratio explains the universe.

        “Thus Martin Gardner’s classic description of the crank scientist in the first chapter of his Fads and Fallacies. In lieu of superfluous comments, let us pass on to Gardner’s list of the “five ways in which the sincere pseudo-scientist’s paranoid tendencies are likely to be exhibited.”

        “1. He considers himself a genius.
        2. He regards his colleagues, without exception, as ignorant blockheads. Everyone is out of step except himself….
        3. He believes himself unjustly persecuted and discriminated against….
        4. He has strong compulsions to focus his attacks on the greatest scientists and the best-established theories. When Newton was the outstanding name in physics, eccentric works in that science were violently anti-Newton. Today, with Einstein the father-symbol of authority, a crank theory of physics is likely to attack Einstein in the name of Newton….
        5. He often has a tendency to write in a complex jargon, in many cases making use of terms and phrases he himself has coined..””..


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s