Which religious organization condones the theft of babies from their mothers? The Roman Catholic Church of course, who else? Which must be one of the most horrible crimes in the world: stealing a child from its mother, the Roman Catholic Church once again stands tall amongst the guilty. Of course they will defend their employees with the world’s most expensive lawyers and lobbyists to make sure they don’t spend a single day in jail and that there will never be justice for the victims. All in the name of jesus! Hallelujah!


Chilean priest probed after ‘stolen babies’ scandal

General view of Santiago, the capital city of ChileFather Joannon is a senior Roman Catholic priest in the Chilean capital, Santiago

Related Stories

A judge in Chile has barred a Catholic priest from leaving the country over claims he had pressured single women to give up their babies for adoption.

The ruling blocks a church recommendation that Father Gerardo Joannon, 77, go on retreat abroad.

He allegedly belonged to a network of clerics and doctors who gave the babies to married couples under the rule of Augusto Pinochet in the 1970s and ’80s.

This was done to avoid the social stigma of unmarried motherhood.

If the women resisted, they were told that their children had died during birth.

‘Fake funerals’

Father Joannon is a senior cleric at the Congregation of the Sacred Hearts of Jesus and Mary in the Chilean capital, Santiago.

Following the allegations, his archdiocese suspended him and launched its own internal investigation.

This week, it concluded that he was involved in two “irregular adoptions”.

In both cases, the mothers were anaesthetised during labour and later told their babies had died.

In actual fact, the children had been given to other families, according to the investigation.

The church said Father Joannon knew they were alive but nevertheless conducted funeral masses for the children.

The church recommended he apologise to his victims and go to Madrid, Spain, “to initiate a process of psychological and spiritual accompaniment”.

The case is being investigated by Chilean Judge Mario Carroza who ordered the cleric to stay in Chile for at least two months while a police investigation continues.


41 thoughts on “Which religious organization condones the theft of babies from their mothers? The Roman Catholic Church of course, who else? Which must be one of the most horrible crimes in the world: stealing a child from its mother, the Roman Catholic Church once again stands tall amongst the guilty. Of course they will defend their employees with the world’s most expensive lawyers and lobbyists to make sure they don’t spend a single day in jail and that there will never be justice for the victims. All in the name of jesus! Hallelujah!

  1. No! No relocation to Spain for this vicious old fart. He can enjoy his psychological and spiritual renewal in a prison cell. I hear the dry bread and cold water served in the Santiago prison does wonders for the soul.


  2. The stockbroker was nervous about being in prison because his cellmate looked like a real thug.

    “Don’t worry,” the gruff looking fellow said, “I’m in here for a white collar crime too.”

    “Well, that’s a relief,” sighed the stockbroker. “I was sent to prison for fraud and insider trading.”

    “Oh nothing fancy like that for me,” grinned the convict. “I just murdered a couple of priests.”


  3. The priest in a small Irish village loved the rooster and ten hens he kept in the hen house behind the church.

    One Sunday morning, before mass, he went to feed the birds and discovered that the cock was missing.

    He knew about cock fights in the village, so he questioned his parishioners in church.

    During mass, he asked the congregation, “Has anybody got a cock?” All the men stood up.

    “No, no,” he said, “that wasn’t what I meant. Has anybody seen a cock?” All the women stood up.

    “No, no,” he said, “that wasn’t what I meant. Has anybody seen my cock?”
    Sixteen altar boys, two priests and a goat stood up.


  4. The Catholic church has never given a hoot about the sexual orientation of their priests or their shenanigans, despite the false outrage of Pope Benedict. As Joseph Ratzinger, he was fully in on the racket of transferring paedophile priests to other parishes.

    Money laundering, paedophile and gay priests engaging in group sex, ongoing discrimination against women, secrecy and unaccountability to civil law – no, of course you mustn’t judge the Catholic church.

    South America is the only continent left where this scum can carry on with their dirty work. There’s a fortune of Colombian drug money in the Vatican Bank, and a lot more to be made.


    On Gay Priests, Pope Francis Asks, ‘Who Am I to Judge?’

    ROME — For generations, homosexuality has largely been a taboo topic for the Vatican, ignored altogether or treated as “an intrinsic moral evil,” in the words of the previous pope.

    In that context, brief remarks by Pope Francis suggesting that he would not judge priests for their sexual orientation, made aboard the papal airplane on the way back from his first foreign trip, to Brazil, resonated through the church. Never veering from church doctrine opposing homosexuality, Francis did strike a more compassionate tone than that of his predecessors, some of whom had largely avoided even saying the more colloquial “gay.”

    “If someone is gay and he searches for the Lord and has good will, who am I to judge?” Francis told reporters, speaking in Italian but using the English word “gay.”

    Francis’s words could not have been more different from those of Benedict XVI, who in 2005 wrote that homosexuality was “a strong tendency ordered toward an intrinsic moral evil,” and an “objective disorder.” The church document said men with “deep-seated homosexual tendencies” should not become priests.

    Vatican experts were quick to point out that Francis was not suggesting that the priests or anyone else should act on their homosexual tendencies, which the church considers a sin. But the fact that he made such comments — and used the word “gay” — was nevertheless revolutionary, and likely to generate significant discussion in local dioceses, where bishops are divided over whether to accept priests who are gay but celibate.

    Francis also told reporters that while Pope John Paul II had definitively closed the door to female priests, he sought a “theology of women” and a greater role for them in Catholic life, news reports said.

    Francis did not dodge a single question, even thanking the person who prompted his comments on homosexuality, asking about Italian news reports of a “gay lobby” inside the Vatican, with clerics blackmailing one another with information about sexual missteps.

    “So much is written about the gay lobby. I have yet to find on a Vatican identity card the word ‘gay,’ ” Francis said, chuckling. “They say there are some gay people here. I think that when we encounter a gay person, we must make the distinction between the fact of a person being gay and the fact of a lobby, because lobbies are not good.”

    An article in the Italian weekly L’Espresso this month alleged that one of the advisers that Francis had appointed to look into the Vatican Bank, Msgr. Battista Ricca, had been accused of having gay trysts when he was a Vatican diplomat in Uruguay. The pope told reporters that nothing in the documentation he had seen substantiated the reports.

    He added that such a lobby would be an issue, but that he did not have anything against gay people and that their sins should be forgiven like those of all Catholics. Francis said that homosexuals should be treated with dignity, and that no one should be subjected to blackmail or pressure because of sexual orientation.

    “The problem isn’t having this orientation. The problem is making a lobby,” he said.

    In recent years, both Benedict and Francis have tried to make changes at the Vatican Bank so that it meets international anti-money-laundering norms that are a condition for using the euro.

    Asked about the bank, Francis said, “Some say that it’s better to have a bank, others that it would be better to have a fund, still others say to close it.”


  5. But let’s not leave the Hindus out of it. Have you ever noticed how Hindus are extremely jealous of what others have? How Hindu women become “Christian” and marry white men so they can fleece them, showing everyone photos of their shopping trips in Paris and Dubai and the latest Merc on Facebook? But secretly worry because their finances are in a mess. And then the husband refuses to take out a bundle of life assurance in her favour. I have had Indian women trying to sneak behind their husband’s back to take out life assurance without the husband’s knowledge – which is not possible, and then they pull out their hair leaving bald patches all over their head.

    My husband had an Indian inspector working for him. When he was invited over to our house he wanted to rent it for himself, furniture included. He was dead serious about it.

    From one of those Topix Q and A’s:

    Q Why are Indian people very competitive and get jealous easily?

    A This is very common. In fact, this is why Indian households smell so strongly of curry. Over many generations, Indians have been trying to outdo one another by cooking a spicier, richer curry than their neighbors. So now its 2014 and curry flavoring has spiraled completely out of control. Its a badge of honor though–Indians will lose their dinner guests’ respect if the curry smells weak.


    • Holyshmoly some people will regard you as a racist. Politics and religion are the reasons that we are not moving forward. Being politically correct or religiously correct is much more in favour than being scientifically correct. Look at affirmative action it is purely based on politics. They are trying to “fix” the ” wrongs ” of the past by making the same mistakes the people made they hate so much. That is not being logic. That is being emmosional and then calling it politically correct. Look at what happened in South – Africa because of that way of thinking. Obviously it is completely absurd to argue that you are going to punish a racial groups individuals because of something that certain individuals in their race did years ago. That is purely racist driven thinking. Get back at the white man! Science has no place for being emotional.


  6. ‘n Mooi stukkie uit Steve Jones (genetikus) se nuwe boek, “The Serpent’s Promise. The Bible retold as science,”

    “In biblical times people asked sensible questions about life, or geology, or the sky at night, and came up what seemed sensible answers. Almost all were wrong, but their philosophy meant that there was no reason to revise them. Piety is – with its promise with life eternal – for optimism, while science is the home of pessimists, who search for ugly facts to destroy their (or at least their rivals’) beautiful theories. They have brought doubt to the world and the world has gained as a result.”

    En verder aan

    “Why build a philosophy on fixed untruths, when we have so many truths, and so much still to find out? There, science cannot help.”


      • Jip dis sooooo bjoetivoel?.
        “when we have so many truths”
        What truths?. . .eh Koel Diek?
        Trufs waarvan ons nie bewus kan wees nie, want “bewussyn” is nog nie “bewys” nie.
        Lewe na die “dood” en voor geboorte wat nie bestaan nie omdat die saaintis dit nog nie bewys het nie.
        Tyd waarmee die saaintis sukkel.
        Gravitasie wat aan ‘n formule gekoppel word en sterk onder verdenking is.

        As julle atijoote dit deur julle duk fundamentalisitese kopvelle kan kry dat die wetenskap is so vêr agter die “lewe” dat om blindelings daaraan te wil glo, jy miskien jou ego opblaas, maar kortwiek jou eie “realiteit” en jou “vryheid” jou eie “vreugde”


  7. Ek sien Mister Prediker Joshua se kerk gastehuis in Nigerië het inmekaargestort. Baie mense dood. o.a. 65 Suid Afrikaners. Mens sou verwag dat die gotte sy skape sou beskerm, maar kennelik was spul aan die slaap en nie in staat om die tragedie te voorkom nie. Maar die skape sal aanhou met die geween vir die maan….


    • Nigerië is al van 1912 onafhanklik van die Franse, so die meeste mense daar is gebore na 1912, en dit tenspyt, lyk Lagos soos ‘n plakkerskamp, en profeet Joshua beweer dat Lagos is die geestelike middelpunt van die heelal (Pretoria die geestelike middelpunt van Afrika – hoekom die middelpunt belangrik is weet ek nie), ja die geestelike middelpunt, nie van die mense nie, nee van die hele heelal – en ek kan dit verstaan vir wat dit is. . . .Mallies se swart broers by wie hy gatkruip, wat nie vêr van die missieng lienk af ontwikkel het nie, maak gelykenisse en gesnede beelde van God wat net in hul “koppe” bestaan. Baie soos die atijoote wat diesefde prinsiep gebruik, maar net met ander woorde en simbole.

      Ek weet nie op hoeveel maniere het ek dit al probeer tuis bring nie, maar niemand gee my ‘n indikasie of hulle eens weet waarna ek verwys nie.


        • Ek gee nie om of jy n rassis is of nie is nie (ek is bang om jou te vra wat beteken die woord rassis vir jou, ek sukkel nou nog met daai bo/on-natuurlik), dis net ‘n foefie wat jou swart broers en hul amerikaanse boeties gebruik om die “usefull idiots” te manipuleer en hul simpatie te misbruik. En hulle verbeel hulle dat hul ego’s gekrenk word as iemand kastig teen hulle diskrimineer.

          Jou verwysing na Jesus wat trots kan wees “wys” net weer dat jou “konsep van God” nog vas staan in jou ego, onveranderd en “geskep” toe jy nog nie skuim gepiepie het nie. Het jy al ooit daaraan gedink dat jy onafhanklik kan funksioneer van jou konsep van jouself?


        • Jip ek het my misgis met ‘n ander land daar êrens, maar kan nou nie meer onthou watter een nie. Afrika bly maar ‘n donker kontinent.


  8. “Gravitasie wat aan ‘n formule gekoppel word en sterk onder verdenking is.”

    Sukkel om eenvoudige wetenskaplike natuurverskynsels te begryp, nè Johannie. Gravitasie is nie aan ‘n formule gekoppel nie – ‘n hele reeks formules beskryf hierdie krag en dit is geensins onder verdenking nie. Spring van ‘n krans af en sien wat gebeur met jou. En hierdie krag is sterker as jou gotte se krag – jy sal nie gered word nie, al sê jou boek van fabels jy sal jou voet nie teen enige klip stamp nie.


    • Ja ek sukkel met die natuurverskynsel van alomteenwoordige gravitasie en nou verduidelik jy dit met die “krans sprong”. Ek kan darem die effek van gravitasie waarneem, al kan ek dit nie sien of hoor of ruik of met my sintuie waarneem nie en die saaintis kan dit meet of die sterkte daarvan meet met hul instrumente. Wow!

      As jy die “geloof sprong” doen sal jy ander kragte waarneem wat op groter “realiteit” gebaseer is en selfs die natuurkragte kan buig, soos die stories wat jy al gehoor het. Maar nou gaan julle fundamentalistiese atijoote en verkondig dat daar nie ‘n geestes “wêreld” bestaan nie en jy net ‘n biologiese masjien is wat tot ‘n begin en einde kom, dat daar geen natuur verskynsel is soos die menslike WIL, emosies, of psige is nie, al daai woorde wat opgemaak is om die mens as ‘n verskynsel te beskryf is sommer net in ons “koppe” en bestaan nie omdat die saaintis dit nie kan meet nie. . . .?

      Nou wonder ek of die saaintis nou al “bewys” het of die menselike “ego” bestaan, is die ego werklik of net in ons koppe. . .? En al is dit net in ons “koppe” hoekom kan sekere mense soos Adriaan en Molly dit nie uitken nie? Of moet ek dit eerder ander stel: Adriaan en Molly kan nie bewus word van die ego in hul koppe nie, want “bewusyn” is nog nie bewys nie?

      Is jy ego gedrewe eh Koel Diek?


      • “As jy die “geloof sprong” doen sal jy ander kragte waarneem wat op groter “realiteit” gebaseer is en selfs die natuurkragte kan buig ..”

        Nee ek sal dit nie waarneem nie, Johanne, al kragte wat jy waarneem is die drogbeelde wat in daardie rasende kop van jou tamboer speel.

        Adriaan is reg, jy soek maatjies maar hierdie blog is nie ‘n plek vir jou nie.


        • “Nee ek sal dit nie waarneem nie,”. . . . . nou hoekom is jy dan te bang om dit te doen? Tjiekensjt! lyk my terwyl jy grootbek kan wees, egosentries en on top is dan voel jy goed en “safe”, maar jy kan nie jou”self” verneder nie, want jy het daai verwaandheid nodig om erkenning aan jou”self” te gee, “jy doen goed my bro” . . . “ander mense is soo dom, maar nie jy nie” ens.

          En die drogbeelde wat jy van praat is die drogbeelde wat jy self probeer het met jou drogtelike konsep wat jy vir jouself gemaak het oor God. (Jou gesnede beeld of gelykenis van God wat jy probeer “worship” het)

          Met jou lam reaksie kan ek net aflei dat jy nie eintlik weet hoe om te reageer nie, jy moet verstaan dat ek dit as ‘n hulpkreet van jou kant af sien!


          • “”Nee ek sal dit nie waarneem nie,”. . . . . nou hoekom is jy dan te bang om dit te doen? ”

            Shit Johannie, maar jy is darem kort van begrip. Of laat daardie rasende kop van jou jou nie toe om rasioneel te dink nie?

            Om dit dan maar vir jou uit te spel. Ek kan nie jou stront wat in jou kop aangaan waarneem nie want my kop raas nie soos joune nie. Dit maak nie saak watse eksotiese spronge ek maak nie – my kop dink rasioneel en daar is geen manier dat ek kragte kan waarneem wat die Natuurkragte buig of teenwerk of wat jy ookal waarneem nie. As ek ‘n klip gooi kom dit terug Aarde toe. Ens., ens., ens.

            En my konsep van jou gotte is nie drogtelik vir my nie – dit is net ‘n rasionele denkwyse dat hulle nie bestaan nie en jy kan hulle nie vir my wys nie. Dink jy nie miskien jou gotte is drogbeelde in jou kop wat jou rasende brein geskep het nie? Ek dink wel so.


            • Jou kop dink rasioneel, ek sou graag meer spesifiek wou weet wat is die “kop” waarna jy verwys, dink jy dat dit jou woord vir “ego” is? of jou psige? En as dit dieselfde betekenis is, sal jy dan kan sê dat ‘n mens ook emosies en ‘n “wil” het?

              En om rasioneel te dink klink so koeël, so asof jy beter as ander skepsels is en ek veronderstel dat een van jou rasionele gedagtes/idee’s wat jy “worship”, is soiets soos “ek sal net iets “glo” as dit bewys word vir my “. (glo bo rede)

              Rasioneel dink vereis ook dat mens nie emosioneel en bevooroordeeld is nie, waaraan jy skuldig is – aan albei. Hoe kan jy weet wat gaan gebeur voor jy die “geloofsprong” neem? As jy dink aan vroeër toe jy ‘n gesnede beeld of ‘n gelykenis van God probeer “worship” het, onthou net dat dit vals was en nog is en dis nie waarheen jy moet terugkeer nie. (As ek nou aan Mallies dink wat skaamteloos verkondig dat die konsep van God wat hy probeer “worship” het was toe altyd deel van die vroulike voortplantings anatomie, ek sou eerder stil gebly het as om ander te “wys” hoe stjoepit ek is).

              “En my konsep van jou gotte is nie drogtelik vir my nie – dit is net ‘n rasionele denkwyse dat hulle nie bestaan nie en jy kan hulle nie vir my wys nie” . . . .?
              Jou konsep van God is – ‘n rasionele denkwyse dat “hulle” nie bestaan nie. . . ? (Veronderstel dis darem beter as maliies s’n)

              Ek probeer vir jou “wys”, maar jy wil nie kyk nie en die rede, wat jy seker probeer glo, is dat jy nou nie tyd het om te mors op iets wat nie bestaan nie, wat bevooroordeling is en nie rasioneel denke nie.


  9. ” ..die wetenskap is so vêr agter die “lewe” ..”

    Watter lewe? Jou lewe is maklik om uit te lê selfs vir ‘n leek – jou kop raas verskrklik en die lawaai maak dat ‘n normale mens jou so ver moontlik vermy. Die wetenskap sit ‘n man op die Maan – wat doen jy? Raas oor wat die wetenskap kan doen en jou gotte nie.


    • Savage, ek dink eerlikwaar Johannie skeer die gek met ons. Dis gotsonmoonlik (selfs vir n versteurde) om soveel kranksinnige tjol kwyt te raak. Hy is of sielsmal; of hy beskik oor n uiters vreemde humorsin.


      • Malherbe, ek het ook al daardie vraag vir myself gevra, maar soos McBrolloks sê: “You can’t make this shit up”.

        Kom, Johannie, gee ons nog ‘n leidraad om meer helderheid oor jou geestetoestand te kry.


        • N bietjie goeie nuus is dat die godiote tans die wind v voor kry met godsdiens in skole. Hulle sit tans met n taaie tameletjie want die konstitusie staan reglynig teenoor die manier waarop sekere beheerliggame godsdiens in skole beoefen. George Claassen het reeds 10 jaar gelede voorspel dat huidige toepassing v godsdiens beoefening on skole onkonstitisioneel en onvolhoubaar is. Hy was reg.


    • Dis nou Koel Diek se analise van my lewe. . .”jou kop raas” . . ? En dan Mallies se analise . . .” ek skeer vir Adriaan . . .”
      en Mad Mac. . .en vir Molly!!? (Kan jou verwysingsraamwerk daarby uitkom Mallies?)

      En Mad Mac met sy hoogs intelligente stelling; “You can’t make this shit up”. Wow en dit kom van iemand wat “realiteit” beskryf as “daai drukking en kreun van die derms met die poephol wat blom”. ‘n Onbewuste “worshiper” van die ontlasting god – Beëlsebub. Wonder hoeveel zolle moet mens rol om as jy daar wil uitgekom?

      Dit laat my begin glo dat hoe ‘n atijoot selfmoord pleeg – hy spring van sy opgeblaasde ego af na sy intelligensie!

      Dan wil julle vir ander mense vertel hoe om te lewe. . .?


  10. Johann soek aandag, almal verwerp hom oralste waar hy gaan. Hy’t nou prober kom maaitjies maak op die laaste plek op aarde waar hy vriendskap sal kry. Hy is niemand se gesprekstrant nie.


  11. 40% Of the American population believes that the world is only 6000 years old. South Africans are probably far worse of than that. An international survey showed that Iceland has the highest proportion of people who believe in evolution and South Africa is the lowest. I saw again on facebook that one should not give technology to a group of illiterate Afrikaners. The far right wings are a bunch of barbaric uncivilised idiots. They are nothing better than left wing blacks. They are trying to fix a mistake with a mistake. Politics sucks! Religion also. Richard Dawkins also said that the world can do nothing with religion. Afrikaners can be a bunch of assholes. I fantasize about starting my own political party. One that has basically the same outlook as Richard Dawkins society for rational thinking. A political party who puts common sense first not emontional thinking. A party that can fix the social problems by working in a logical way. Create a South Africa where people have water ( Like they use to have all these years), have electricity ( Like they use to all these years), where there are jobs for people who work hard and have the will to empower themselves. Where houses are build, crime is handled the right way, where schoolkids are educated in the best way possible and they learn to think morally and logic and fair. All those can only be achieved through logical thinking not emotional thinking. I leave it up to your imagination to think why all this is not possible in South Africa.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s